Live data

Mantle vs Cosmos Hub Staking

Side-by-side comparison of MNT and ATOM staking yields, risk, and key metrics. Updated every 4 hours.

Mantle
Mantle
MNT
5.00%
APY
Cosmos Hub
Cosmos Hub
ATOM
20.49%
APY

Detailed comparison

Metric
Mantle (MNT)
Cosmos Hub (ATOM)
Staking APY
5.00%
20.49%Winner
Price
$0.67
$1.82
Market Cap
$2.18BWinner
$917.40M
Total Staked
$647.06MWinner
$595.02M
Staking Ratio
30.0%
67.0%
Risk Level
medium
lowWinner
Staking Type
native
native
Blockchain
Mantle
Cosmos
Min Stake
1 MNT
0.01 ATOM

Mantle vs Cosmos Hub: which should you stake?

Cosmos Hub currently offers the higher APY at 20.49% compared to Mantle's 5.00%. That's a 15.49 percentage point difference in annual yield.

In terms of market cap, Mantle is the larger asset at $2.18B, which generally indicates more liquidity and lower volatility risk.

Both assets can be staked through various platforms and protocols. Consider diversifying across both rather than choosing one exclusively — this spreads your risk across different networks and ecosystems.

Mantle vs Cosmos Hub — common questions

Is Mantle or Cosmos Hub better for staking?

Cosmos Hub currently offers a higher staking APY at 20.49% compared to Mantle's 5.00%. However, the best choice depends on your risk tolerance, investment horizon, and portfolio strategy.

What is the APY difference between Mantle and Cosmos Hub?

Mantle offers 5.00% APY while Cosmos Hub offers 20.49% APY — a difference of 15.49 percentage points.

Which is safer to stake: MNT or ATOM?

Mantle has a medium risk rating while Cosmos Hub has a low risk rating. Lower risk typically means a more established network with stronger validator infrastructure.

Can I stake both MNT and ATOM?

Yes, diversifying across multiple staking assets is a common strategy. Staking both Mantle and Cosmos Hub spreads your risk across different networks and protocols.

Staking guides

More asset comparisons

Compare all staking assets

See yields across 200+ assets in one place.