Live data

clBTC vs Cosmos Hub Staking

Side-by-side comparison of CLBTC and ATOM staking yields, risk, and key metrics. Updated every 4 hours.

clBTC
clBTC
CLBTC
4.00%
APY
Cosmos Hub
Cosmos Hub
ATOM
20.49%
APY

Detailed comparison

Metric
clBTC (CLBTC)
Cosmos Hub (ATOM)
Staking APY
4.00%
20.49%Winner
Price
$72.29K
$1.82
Market Cap
$1.01BWinner
$917.40M
Total Staked
$993.11MWinner
$595.02M
Staking Ratio
100.0%
67.0%
Risk Level
medium
lowWinner
Staking Type
liquid
native
Blockchain
clBTC
Cosmos
Min Stake
None
0.01 ATOM

clBTC vs Cosmos Hub: which should you stake?

Cosmos Hub currently offers the higher APY at 20.49% compared to clBTC's 4.00%. That's a 16.49 percentage point difference in annual yield.

In terms of market cap, clBTC is the larger asset at $1.01B, which generally indicates more liquidity and lower volatility risk.

Both assets can be staked through various platforms and protocols. Consider diversifying across both rather than choosing one exclusively — this spreads your risk across different networks and ecosystems.

clBTC vs Cosmos Hub — common questions

Is clBTC or Cosmos Hub better for staking?

Cosmos Hub currently offers a higher staking APY at 20.49% compared to clBTC's 4.00%. However, the best choice depends on your risk tolerance, investment horizon, and portfolio strategy.

What is the APY difference between clBTC and Cosmos Hub?

clBTC offers 4.00% APY while Cosmos Hub offers 20.49% APY — a difference of 16.49 percentage points.

Which is safer to stake: CLBTC or ATOM?

clBTC has a medium risk rating while Cosmos Hub has a low risk rating. Lower risk typically means a more established network with stronger validator infrastructure.

Can I stake both CLBTC and ATOM?

Yes, diversifying across multiple staking assets is a common strategy. Staking both clBTC and Cosmos Hub spreads your risk across different networks and protocols.

Staking guides

More asset comparisons

Compare all staking assets

See yields across 200+ assets in one place.