Figment vs Chorus One: Staking Comparison 2026

Side-by-side analysis of fees, APY, supported assets, and risks to help you pick the right staking platform.

🏛️
Figment wins overall
Institutional-grade staking infrastructure
🏛️
Figment
Non-custodial
6.0%
Avg APY
✅ Low risk
🎵
Chorus One
Non-custodial
6.5%
Avg APY
✅ Low risk

Figment vs Chorus One — Feature comparison

FeatureFigmentChorus One
Avg APY6.0%6.5%
TVL$12B$6B
Risk levellowlow
CustodyNon-custodialNon-custodial
FeesVaries (institutional pricing)5–10% commission
Min stakeInstitutional minimums applyNetwork minimum
Lock periodNetwork-dependentNetwork-dependent
Assets supported8+ assets8+ assets
Insurance✅ Yes✅ Yes
Audit status✅ Audited✅ Audited
Our rating4.7/54.6/5
Some links are affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Who should use each platform?

🏛️Choose Figment if…
  • 40+ networks with institutional SLAs
  • Slash insurance from Lloyd's of London
  • Compliance tooling (tax reports, AML)
🎵Choose Chorus One if…
  • Deep protocol research and contributions
  • 40+ networks with institutional SLAs
  • OPUS: MEV-boost and restaking expertise

More platform comparisons

Figment vs Chorus One Staking 2026 — Which is Better? | Stacky