Live data

Gate vs Cosmos Hub Staking

Side-by-side comparison of GT and ATOM staking yields, risk, and key metrics. Updated every 4 hours.

Gate
Gate
GT
8.00%
APY
Cosmos Hub
Cosmos Hub
ATOM
15.00%
APY

Detailed comparison

Metric
Gate (GT)
Cosmos Hub (ATOM)
Staking APY
8.00%
15.00%Winner
Price
$6.48
$1.78
Market Cap
$1.13BWinner
$894.82M
Total Staked
$339.93M
$595.02MWinner
Staking Ratio
30.0%
67.0%
Risk Level
medium
lowWinner
Staking Type
native
native
Blockchain
Gate
Cosmos
Min Stake
None
0.01 ATOM

Gate vs Cosmos Hub: which should you stake?

Cosmos Hub currently offers the higher APY at 15.00% compared to Gate's 8.00%. That's a 7.00 percentage point difference in annual yield.

In terms of market cap, Gate is the larger asset at $1.13B, which generally indicates more liquidity and lower volatility risk.

Both assets can be staked through various platforms and protocols. Consider diversifying across both rather than choosing one exclusively — this spreads your risk across different networks and ecosystems.

Gate vs Cosmos Hub — common questions

Is Gate or Cosmos Hub better for staking?

Cosmos Hub currently offers a higher staking APY at 15.00% compared to Gate's 8.00%. However, the best choice depends on your risk tolerance, investment horizon, and portfolio strategy.

What is the APY difference between Gate and Cosmos Hub?

Gate offers 8.00% APY while Cosmos Hub offers 15.00% APY — a difference of 7.00 percentage points.

Which is safer to stake: GT or ATOM?

Gate has a medium risk rating while Cosmos Hub has a low risk rating. Lower risk typically means a more established network with stronger validator infrastructure.

Can I stake both GT and ATOM?

Yes, diversifying across multiple staking assets is a common strategy. Staking both Gate and Cosmos Hub spreads your risk across different networks and protocols.

Staking guides

More asset comparisons

Compare all staking assets

See yields across 200+ assets in one place.