BENQI vs Stader Labs: Staking Comparison 2026

Side-by-side analysis of fees, APY, supported assets, and risks to help you pick the right staking platform.

🌐
Stader Labs wins overall
Multi-chain liquid staking on 6+ blockchains
🏔️
BENQI
Non-custodial
8.0%
Avg APY
⚠️ Medium risk
🌐
Stader Labs
Non-custodial
5.5%
Avg APY
⚠️ Medium risk

BENQI vs Stader Labs — Feature comparison

FeatureBENQIStader Labs
Avg APY8.0%5.5%
TVL$0.4B$0.9B
Risk levelmediummedium
CustodyNon-custodialNon-custodial
Fees10% of staking rewards10% of staking rewards
Min stake0 AVAX0.1 ETH / varies by chain
Lock periodFlexible (sAVAX is liquid)Flexible
Assets supported1+ assets6+ assets
Insurance❌ No❌ No
Audit status✅ Audited✅ Audited
Our rating4.0/54.0/5
Some links are affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Who should use each platform?

🏔️Choose BENQI if…
  • Avalanche-native — no bridge risk
  • sAVAX usable in Trader Joe, GMX, and other Avalanche DeFi
  • Integrated lending market (Qi Protocol)
🌐Choose Stader Labs if…
  • Multi-chain support — stake 6+ assets in one platform
  • Liquid staking tokens (ETHx, BNBx, etc.) DeFi-ready
  • ETHx includes DVT technology for reduced validator risk

More platform comparisons