Live data

Injective vs MultiversX Staking

Side-by-side comparison of INJ and EGLD staking yields, risk, and key metrics. Updated every 4 hours.

Injective
Injective
INJ
6.39%
APY
MultiversX
MultiversX
EGLD
8.90%
APY

Detailed comparison

Metric
Injective (INJ)
MultiversX (EGLD)
Staking APY
6.39%
8.90%Winner
Price
$2.99
$3.86
Market Cap
$299.30MWinner
$114.48M
Total Staked
$89.19MWinner
$34.35M
Staking Ratio
30.0%
30.0%
Risk Level
medium
medium
Staking Type
native
native
Blockchain
Injective
MultiversX
Min Stake
None
1 EGLD

Injective vs MultiversX: which should you stake?

MultiversX currently offers the higher APY at 8.90% compared to Injective's 6.39%. That's a 2.51 percentage point difference in annual yield.

In terms of market cap, Injective is the larger asset at $299.30M, which generally indicates more liquidity and lower volatility risk.

Both assets can be staked through various platforms and protocols. Consider diversifying across both rather than choosing one exclusively — this spreads your risk across different networks and ecosystems.

Injective vs MultiversX — common questions

Is Injective or MultiversX better for staking?

MultiversX currently offers a higher staking APY at 8.90% compared to Injective's 6.39%. However, the best choice depends on your risk tolerance, investment horizon, and portfolio strategy.

What is the APY difference between Injective and MultiversX?

Injective offers 6.39% APY while MultiversX offers 8.90% APY — a difference of 2.51 percentage points.

Which is safer to stake: INJ or EGLD?

Injective has a medium risk rating while MultiversX has a medium risk rating. Lower risk typically means a more established network with stronger validator infrastructure.

Can I stake both INJ and EGLD?

Yes, diversifying across multiple staking assets is a common strategy. Staking both Injective and MultiversX spreads your risk across different networks and protocols.

Staking guides

More asset comparisons

Compare all staking assets

See yields across 200+ assets in one place.